Still wondering if the Sony Alpha 900 is more superior in comparison with NIkon D3x or the other way round? Move on to Nikon D3x vs Sony Alpha 900 ISO50-ISO6400 100% Cropped Comparison to have a quick comparison between the two.
I have to admit that the Nikon D3x is better than the Sony A900 in terms of image quality, but the difference does not convince me to pay out the US$7999 permiun for one. I will probably get a Sony Alpha 900 with almost similar 24.5 Megapixel resolution full frame camera as the NIkon D3x for the price of less than US$3000.
…thanks for the A700 manual…
re:
“I have to admit that the Nikon D3x is better than the Sony A900 in terms of image quality, but the difference does not convince me to pay out the US$7999 permiun for one. ”
…but of course, if one just looks at “image-quality” not even correcting for true ISO.
It’s a simple thing, and on that basis alone there is no way that a 24MP Nikon fullframe is worth 4x as much as a 24MP Sony fullframe.
Either you need the Nikon and need to spend the extra $6k or you can get away with the Sony and save $6k. And that’s assuming that you need a 24MP fullframe in the first place.
One of the easiest hardware-choices ever :)
Like or Dislike:
0 
0